Our Research Standards
The Genius Trick exists for one reason: to help people think more clearly and make better decisions. That only works if the information we publish is honest, careful, and grounded in real evidence.
This page explains how we research topics, how we evaluate tools and products, and how we handle corrections.
How We Approach Research
We start with a simple question: What is actually being claimed?
Before writing a single sentence, we define:
- What outcome is being promised (focus, clarity, memory, energy, etc.)
- Who the claim applies to (age, health status, experience level)
- How the outcome is measured
- Over what timeframe results are expected
This prevents vague conclusions and exaggerated promises.
Sources We Prioritize
Whenever possible, we rely on primary and high-quality sources, including:
- Peer-reviewed research studies
- Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- Clinical guidelines
- University and hospital publications
- Government and major public-health resources
We may reference expert opinions or real-world experiences for context, but we do not treat anecdotes as proof.
How We Judge Strength of Evidence
Not all evidence is equal. Internally, we evaluate claims based on the overall quality and consistency of the research.
- Stronger evidence: Multiple well-designed studies pointing in the same direction
- Mixed evidence: Limited or conflicting results
- Weak evidence: Mostly anecdotal or poorly controlled studies
When evidence is limited or uncertain, we say so clearly.
Turning Research Into Practical Guidance
Research only matters if it helps in real life.
Our goal is to translate complex information into clear, practical takeaways:
- What something is
- What it may help with
- What it does not do
- Potential risks or downsides
- Who should avoid it
- What to try first before moving on to more advanced tools
We avoid miracle language, urgency tactics, and exaggerated claims.
How We Review Tools and Products
When we discuss tools, programs, or supplements, our priority is protecting trust.
Each review asks:
- What problem does this actually solve?
- What evidence supports it?
- What are the limitations?
- Who is it not for?
- Are the marketing claims realistic?
If something appears misleading or overhyped, we either reject it or explain the risks clearly.
Affiliate Relationships
Some links on The Genius Trick may be affiliate links. If you choose to purchase through one of these links, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you.
Affiliate relationships do not influence our conclusions. If a product is weak, we say it’s weak.
Medical and Legal Disclaimer
The Genius Trick provides educational information only. We are not diagnosing, treating, curing, or preventing any medical condition.
Always consult a qualified professional for medical or health-related concerns.
Corrections Policy
If we make a mistake, we correct it.
This includes factual errors, misleading wording, or outdated references.
If you believe something is incorrect, contact us with the article title, the issue you found, and a supporting source if available. Confirmed errors are updated promptly.
Our commitment is simple: clarity over hype, evidence over opinion, and long-term trust over short-term clicks.